New Hope Group header banner - with the logo and a haul truck from their site

From Paper Permits and Conflicting Data to a Single Source of Truth: How New Hope Group Took Control of Spatial Data on Site

Case Study  June 15, 2026
63
Permits now managed digitally, end-to-end, with full audit trail
Hours +
Reduction in time spent by environmental team on data requests from the survey team
Decades
Of paper-based permit management replaced with a single, cloud-based spatial record
New Hope Group partnered with COSOL to replace a decades-old paper permit process with a cloud-based GIS system that put a single, trusted spatial record at the centre of every decision made on site.

About New Hope Group

New Hope Group is an Australian coal mining company operating in Queensland. The New Acland Coal (NAC) Mine manages the full range of surface mining activities including excavation, overburden management, environmental compliance, and mine planning. For a site like NAC, spatial data is not a background administrative function. It sits at the centre of every daily operational decision, determining where the diggers go, what land can be cleared, what falls within an Environmental Authority boundary, and what cannot be touched.

Image
Mining operations of this type carry significant regulatory accountability. Spatial errors do not just create operational delays. They create compliance breaches, legal exposure, and reputational damage that can affect a mine's operating licence. For the survey and planning team, maintaining accurate, current, and trustworthy spatial data is not optional. It is the foundation on which every permit, every clearing decision, and every drill programme rests. New Hope Group's NAC operation had been running on paper-based permit processes since the mine opened, and when the site came out of Care and Maintenance in approximately 2023, the team made a deliberate decision that the old way of managing spatial data was no longer fit for purpose.

The Challenge

For as long as anyone on site could remember, permits at NAC had been managed on paper. Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner and Surveyor at NAC, described the process plainly, "It was a paper-based thing. We had all sorts of troubles losing the actual paper copies, permits not going to the right people, the right checks weren't being made. There were a lot of shortcuts that were being taken."

The consequences of those shortcuts were not abstract. The site was running environmental compliance checks against the wrong datasets. Multiple versions of spatial files existed across multiple systems simultaneously, with no central authority over which one was current and no way to trace where an error had entered the process.

The site operates on AGD 84 datum while government departments require data in GDA 94, or more recently GDA 2020. At the scale of a mine site, those datum differences translate to positional errors of up to 200 metres. The practical risk was that a drill hole could be placed on a neighbouring property, or mining activity could push outside the Environmental Authority boundary, with the team having no reliable mechanism to catch the error before it became a breach. Martin described just how close the situation had come to exactly that.

Image
"We were close to making some mistakes which would have lead to us breaching our Mining Approvals."

- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group

The environmental team, who carried the compliance accountability day to day, had no independent way to check constraint data. Every query had to be routed back to the survey team. The back-and-forth between teams added friction to every operational planning decision and created a dependency that was consuming time on both sides. 

It was the combination of these risks coming to a head that forced the decision. 

"We made a decision that: No, that's it. Everything had to go through the surveyors before it was published. We were having data going externally that we had no control over and we didn't know what was being sent where. So we basically contacted COSOL and they came up with a plan, which has sorted a lot of that out."
- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group

Working With COSOL

When New Acland came out of Care and Maintenance and the decision was made to replace the paper permit process, the site team engaged COSOL to design and implement a solution. What gave the team confidence early was not a presentation or a proposal. It was how the work actually ran from the first meeting forward.

"When we started off the process, we were having fairly regular meetings and they were supplying examples of where they were up to and bringing us up to speed. There was never a shortage of information flow. They always kept us in the loop. If we needed to tweak it, we'd tweak it now rather than when the system was in place."

- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group  

That responsiveness extended beyond project meetings and into the day-to-day working relationship that followed go-live. For a small site team managing a complex system, the availability of the people behind it matters as much as the quality of the build.

"There's very few companies that would make themselves available and work around our time zone as well. I know I've probably kept them back after work hours a couple of times."
- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group
Image

The Approach

COSOL's GIS team, with a combined 50 years of experience in spatial data and asset management, was engaged to design and implement a cloud-based solution built on Esri ArcGIS. The scope covered two connected components: a Permit Management System to replace the paper-based approval process, and a Spatial Viewer that would serve as the single, authoritative source of spatial data for the entire site.

The design principle was deliberate. Rather than asking people to check the right dataset or follow the right process from memory, the system was built so that the correct outcome happened by design. Datum conversion happens automatically on data ingestion. Environmental constraints are captured at the point of permit creation. Every approval is traceable. Every spatial file attached to a permit is validated before the process moves forward.

For a site where a 200-metre datum error had previously created near-miss compliance risk, this was not a feature. It was the point.

The permit workflow was rebuilt from the ground up. What had previously moved on paper through an uncontrolled sequence of desks and sign-offs was replaced with a digital process in which every stage is recorded and every check is enforced. The environmental team can now access all constraint data directly through the Spatial Viewer without routing requests through the survey team. The survey team retains control over what enters the system, which protects data integrity without making them a bottleneck for every downstream query.

Martin arrived at the engagement with no prior ArcGIS experience. The COSOL team worked through training progressively, building his capability alongside the system rather than delivering a completed product and stepping back. The breadth of knowledge required was not trivial.

"I haven't come up with a question that hasn't been able to be answered yet. Which is fairly impressive, considering the vast size of ArcGIS and Pro, and we're working on three different systems to get it all together."

- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group

The early stages required real commitment from the NAC team. Martin was candid about what that looked like from his side.

"At the start, I didn't have a clue. And I don't think any of us had a clue about what was happening. They were basically talking in a different language. But the more we went through the progress of the permit product and the training that we did, now I'm in a position where I've probably got three-quarters of an idea how to do it. And it's second nature now to use it."
- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group
Image

Business Impact

The most immediate change was the elimination of the data integrity problem that had defined the previous process. There is now one authoritative source of spatial data on site, and Martin described what that single change meant in practice.

"We have a lot more confidence in the decisions that are made as a result of the spatial data, because we know what is on that system is correct. If it is wrong, the way that we've set up the attributes, it'll tell us who was wrong and may lead to why it was wrong."

- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group

The environmental team now operates with a level of independence that was not possible under the paper process. Every constraint check that previously required a request back to the survey team is now handled directly through the Spatial Viewer. The back-and-forth that previously added time and friction to operational planning has been largely removed. The environmental advisors know where to go, the data is there, and they can run their constraints reporting without waiting on anyone.

The system is also being used in ways that were not part of the original scope. Annual mine plans, previously produced in mining-specific software, are now produced in ArcGIS Pro. Data sharing with external parties has become more straightforward, because the system can export into formats that third-party CAD packages and government agencies can receive directly. What is clear is that NAC has not come close to the ceiling of what the platform can do.

"We are now finding more and more uses for the system and I don't think we have really scratched the surface of its capabilities."

- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group

New Hope Group's sister company, Bengalla, came onto the same platform after seeing what NAC had built and has since extended the use case further into field-based data capture for environmental staff working in the pit.

When asked to reflect on the return on investment, Martin did not reach for an efficiency metric. He went straight to what the system is ultimately protecting against.

"If we were to breach our Environmental Authority by mining in the wrong spot or drilling on someone else's property, you've got the legal backlash, the civil backlash from the neighbours, reputational damage. For what it supplies and the confidence that it gives us, it was really a no-brainer to do it."
- Martin Leggat, Short-Term Mine Planner, New Hope Group
Key outcomes at a glance
  • Paper-based permit process replaced with a fully digital, spatially grounded permit lifecycle
  • Environmental team now self-sufficient for constraint checking, reducing dependency on the survey team
  • Datum conversion errors eliminated through automated coordinate system alignment on data ingestion
  • Single source of truth established with controlled data entry and full audit trail
  • Annual mine plans now produced in ArcGIS Pro, removing reliance on a separate mining software workflow
  • External data sharing improved through ArcGIS export capability compatible with third-party formats
  • Sister company Bengalla adopted the same platform following NAC's implementation

About COSOL

COSOL is built on one belief: in asset-centric industries, reliability is everything. We're a trusted, data-led asset management partner for organisations around the world who can't afford to fail. And known for our deep expertise, dependable delivery, and ability to keep critical assets performing at their best.

The company recently celebrated 25 years in business and recognised as reliable partners by their clients across the globe.