At a glance
- Mining client required a new HME fleet strategy to optimise costs and align equipment decisions with mine closure in 10 years.
- Asset replacement was complicated by ageing fleets, labour shortages, capital limits, and long acquisition lead times
- COSOL developed a fact-based HME fleet strategy, modelling whole-of-life costs, risks, and mine plan demand to guide decisions.
- Results included a 12.5% cost reduction, 4% uplift in asset availability, and 8.2% less maintenance labour demand.
While maintaining consistent performance over 10 years
Developing an effective fleet strategy is a complex task for mining companies. Asset performance, maintenance tactics, labour factors, business risks, life of mine, OEM pricing and capital availability all influence fleet replacement decisions.
For internal decision-makers, this can lead to:

Challenge
With 10-years remaining until the mine's end of life, our client needed to make critical strategic decisions on their fleet, including replacement and maintenance. The COSOL team knew that they had to consider the site's unique financial, maintenance, performance and risk parameters, including:

Considering these issues, COSOL approached the client's heavy mobile equipment (HME) fleet strategy with three success criteria in mind.
- Improve asset availability and reliability
- Reduce capital and maintenance expenditure
- Minimise on-site maintenance labour demand
Solution
Working with the client's team, COSOL undertook a comprehensive analysis and decision process to ensure that the recommended fleet strategy was backed by fact-based insights. This involved:
01
Gaining a clear understanding of asset demand over life of mine
02
Aligned decisions on the best solutions - considering the unique business context
03
Coordinated actions to deliver results quickly
01 Understand
Most fleet replacement analyses across the mining industry use one of three techniques:
- Industry benchmarking
- Equipment manufacturer (OEM) replacement age recommendations
- Lowest maintenance cost points
However, these methods alone don't consider critical factors specific to a mine and its assets -Â leaving significant value unrealised. COSOL would build upon these basic principles to formulate a strategy most suited to the client's situation.
To determine how to achieve these best-for-business outcomes...
COSOL examined relevant high-impact quantitative and qualitative data - including:
Mine plan demand
requirements
Whole-of-life costs
and labour requirements
Depreciation, inflation
and cash rate
Capital
availability
Asset suitability for
the client and project
Unique business and
site characteristics
Technical
risk
Fleet automation capabilities
and integrations
Carbon emissions
and ESG implications
02 Decide
Outcomes
- New fleet strategy with improved replacement points for each asset – including order points that consider acquisition lead times:
- Hydraulic excavators – replaced at 54,000 hours
- Caterpillar 793 and Hitachi EH5000 – run to the mine’s end of life, supported by new and individualised maintenance strategies that mitigate late life failure modes (like cracking and repair downtime)
- Bulldozers, loaders, drills and graders – aligned to the most economical replacement points, considering residual value at the mine’s end of life.
- Verified business value case shown in Net Present Value.
- Optimised capital spend profile, outlining impacts that spend decision scenarios will have on whole-of-life business costs, maintenance and labour requirements.
- Toolset for client’s team to analyse subsequent fleet strategy scenarios and capital spend options.
- Training for client’s engineering team in fleet strategy decision-making, data analysis, toolsets and process improvement.

AUD 142.3 million
Net Present Value to client;Â a reduction of 12.5% in total costs (NPC)

Up to
4% improvement
in asset availability, with no decline in performance

8.2% reduction
in maintenance labour demand

Additional value from
increased production
through identified asset configuration options